Concavity compression is a stabilizing mechanism in which compression of the convex humeral head into the concave glenoid fossa stabilizes it against translating forces.
Depth and stability
The stability is related to the depth of the concavity and the magnitude of the compressive force.
The anatomy of the glenohumeral joint is well adapted to facilitate stabilization through concavity compression. The rotator cuff is ideally situated to provide a compressive load throughout the range of motion of the glenohumeral joint. The concavity in the glenoid is provided by the shape of the glenoid bone by the increased thickness of the articular cartilage at the periphery of the glenoid fossa and by the glenoid labrum.
As the humeral head is translated from the center of the glenoid fossa over the glenoid lip it must displace laterally (i.e. in a direction parallel to the glenoid center line). The path of the humeral head center during this ascent from the center over the lip has a particular "gull wing" shape. The narrowness of this "gull wing" is a major contributor to the centering of the head in the glenoid: essentially no translation is possible without the head being lifted from the depths of the glenoid fossa. The effective depth of the glenoid in a specified direction of translation is the amount of displacement in the lateral direction required for the head of the humerus to translate from the center of the glenoid to the top of the lip of the glenoid.
We conducted a series of experiments to determine the degree to which concavity compression can stabilize the humeral head against translating forces parallel to the surface of the glenoid. For each shoulder we measured the effective glenoid depth in each of four directions of translation: superior inferior anterior and posterior. For all ten cadaver shoulders the average effective glenoid depths were greater superiorly (4.8 mm) and inferiorly (4.9 mm) than anteriorly (2.2 mm) and posteriorly (2.1 mm). The greater depth for translation in the superior and inferior directions is a direct consequence of the oblong shape of the fossa and its constant radius of curvature.
We measured the stability from concavity compression with compressive loads of 50 and 100 Newtons. Concavity compression proved to be an effective mechanism for stabilizing the humeral head against translating forces. For example a compressive load of 50 Newtons stabilized the humeral head against inferiorly directed translating forces averaging 32 Newtons. Doubling the compressive load to 100 Newtons increased the inferior force that could be stabilized to an average of 56 Newtons. The effectiveness of the concavity compression mechanism varied with different directions of translating force. For a given compressive load the stability was greater against superiorly and inferiorly directed forces than against forces directed anteriorly and posteriorly. Doubling the compressive load from 50 to 100 Newtons did not quite double the translating force that can be stabilized. This suggests that deformability of the lip of the glenoid fossa may provide less effective glenoid depth with greater applied loads.
To facilitate the comparison of the effectiveness of concavity compression under different conditions a "stability factor" was calculated as:
Stability Ratio = (Translation Force at Dislocation)/(Compressive Load).
The stability ratios for the different directions of translation can be shown in a glenoid map.
After characterizing the stability factors for the ten shoulders with the labrum intact the labrum was excised entirely and the tests repeated. Excision of the labrum diminished the stability factors for all directions of displacement and for both magnitudes of compressive loading. In the shoulder specimens from these older cadavers with relatively atrophic labra labral excision reduced the stability factor by an average of 20 percent. The contribution of the labrum to stability is likely to be even greater in younger shoulders.
The stability factors correlated with the effective depth of the glenoid concavity both when the labrum was present and after it was excised. A plot of the eight stability factors as a function of the respective values for the effective glenoid depth reveals a consistent relationship.
The strong relationship between depth and stability from concavity compression suggests that this stabilizing mechanism is compromised when the glenoid is developmentally small or flat or when the effective concavity of the glenoid has been lessened by injury or wear. Glenoids with flat posterior lips contribute to posterior glenohumeral subluxation and dislocation. Glenoid rim fractures involving significant loss of glenoid concavity are associated with glenohumeral instability. Avulsion of the glenoid labrum in traumatic instability lessens the effective depth of the glenoid concavity predisposing the joint to recurrent subluxation and dislocation. Anatomic reattachment of a detached labrum and glenohumeral ligament back to the glenoid rim helps restore the effective glenoid depth and stability.
Movie
Click to play |
Concavity compression |
Concavity compression |
|
|
|
|
|
|